Publications
Factors influencing differences between invasive and spontaneous baroreflex estimates: distinct methods or different data?. In: {33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering-in-Medicine-and-Biology-Society (EMBS)}. {IEEE}; 2011. {. {p. 2554-2557p. }.Edit
Correlation between time domain baroreflex sensitivity and Sympathetic Nerve Activity. In: Murray A, editor. {37th Annual Conference of the Computing-in-Cardiology}. Vol {37}. {IEEE}; 2010. {. {p. 5-8p. }.Edit
P wave delineation using spatially projected leads from wavelet transform loops. In: Murray A, editor. {37th Annual Conference of the Computing-in-Cardiology}. Vol {37}. {IEEE}; 2010. {. {p. 1003-1006p. }.Edit
Are 2 Electrocardiographic Leads Enough for Multilead Wave Boundary Location and QT Measuring? In: Murray A, editor. {36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference (CinC 2009)}. Vol {36}. {IEEE}; 2009. {. {p. 593-596p. }.Edit
Multilead ECG Delineation Using Spatially Projected Leads From Wavelet Transform Loops. {IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING}. 2009;{56}:{1996-2005}.Edit
Time domain baroreflex sensitivity assessment by joint analysis of spontaneous SBP and RR series. {BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL}. 2009;{4}:{254-261}.Edit
BRS Analysis from Baroreflex Sequences and Baroreflex Events Compared Using Spontaneous and Drug Induced Data. In: {35th Annual Conference on Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {35}. {IEEE}; 2008. {. {p. 737-740p. }.Edit
Improved Time Domain BRS Assessment with the Use of Baroreflex Events. In: {34th Annual Conference on Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {34}. {IEEE}; 2007. {. {p. 813-816p. }.Edit
Threshold Sensitivity in Time Domain BRS Estimation: Minimum Beat-to-Beat Changes and Minimum Correlation. In: {34th Annual Conference on Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {34}. {IEEE}; 2007. {. {p. 557-560p. }.Edit
Automatic multilead VCG based approach for QT interval measurement. In: {Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {33}.; 2006. {. {p. 369-372p. }.Edit
Improved BRS assessment using the global approach in the sequences technique. In: {Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {33}.; 2006. {. {p. 641-644p. }.Edit
QT variability and HRV interactions in ECG: Quantification and reliability. {IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING}. 2006;{53}:{1317-1329}.Edit
Stability of QT measurements in the PTB database depending on the selected lead. In: {Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {33}.; 2006. {. {p. 341-344p. }.Edit
Improved QT variability quantification by multilead automatic delineation. In: {32nd Annual Conference on Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {32}. {IEEE}; 2005. {. {p. 503-506p. }.Edit
Quantification of the QT variability related to HRV: Robustness study facing automatic delineation and noise on the ECG. In: {31st Annual Scientific Meeting on Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {31}. {IEEE}; 2004. {. {p. 769-772p. }.Edit
A wavelet-based ECG delineator: Evaluation on standard databases. {IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING}. 2004;{51}:{570-581}.Edit
A parametric model approach for quantification of short term QT variability uncorrelated with heart rate variability. In: Murray A, editor. {30th Annual Meeting on Computers in Cardiology}. Vol {30}. {IEEE}; 2003. {. {p. 165-168p. }.Edit